{"id":27427,"date":"2026-10-13T14:10:51","date_gmt":"2026-10-13T12:10:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/"},"modified":"2026-10-13T14:10:51","modified_gmt":"2026-10-13T12:10:51","slug":"snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/","title":{"rendered":"SNL Veteran Weighs In on Shane Gillis\u2019 Controversial \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d Joke"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_89 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #ffffff;color:#ffffff\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #ffffff;color:#ffffff\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/#Ego_Nwodims_%E2%80%9CReporting_for_Duty%E2%80%9D_Response_to_Shane_Gillis\" >Ego Nwodim\u2019s \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d Response to Shane Gillis<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/#Why_Shane_Gillis_SNL_Monologue_Sparked_a_Humor_Debate\" >Why Shane Gillis\u2019 SNL Monologue Sparked a Humor Debate<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/#Dan_Levys_Criticism_and_the_Wider_Public_Reaction\" >Dan Levy\u2019s Criticism and the Wider Public Reaction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/#How_SNLs_Live_Format_Shapes_a_Jokes_Afterlife\" >How SNL\u2019s Live Format Shapes a Joke\u2019s Afterlife<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/#What_the_Controversy_Reveals_About_Stand-Up_and_Pop_Culture\" >What the Controversy Reveals About Stand-Up and Pop Culture<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ego_Nwodims_%E2%80%9CReporting_for_Duty%E2%80%9D_Response_to_Shane_Gillis\"><\/span>Ego Nwodim\u2019s \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d Response to Shane Gillis<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Former <strong>SNL veteran<\/strong> Ego Nwodim joined the conversation around Shane Gillis after the comedian\u2019s hosting monologue drew criticism for comments about women\u2019s gym clothing. Rather than issue a lengthy statement, Nwodim used Instagram Stories for a brief, pointed response: a gym selfie captioned \u201cWh\u2013e reporting for duty,\u201d followed by a picture of her post-workout meal and the line \u201cGetting my 30 grams of protein after heauxing.\u201d The joke echoed Gillis\u2019 language while turning its target back toward the assumptions behind it.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The format mattered. Instagram Stories are informal and temporary, but they can travel far beyond their original audience once viewers take screenshots and repost them. Nwodim\u2019s two posts therefore worked both as a personal reaction and as a compact piece of social commentary, with the fitness setting making the reference unmistakable. Their humor depended on recognition: followers who had heard Gillis\u2019 routine could connect the captions to the broader dispute immediately.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gillis had joked that he had not been to a gym in a long time and was surprised that some women wore short workout clothes. In the monologue, he used a derogatory term to describe them, then added that people exercising nearby should avoid looking because they could appear in TikTok videos. That combination\u2014commentary about clothing, a slur, and a joke about being filmed\u2014became the focus of the <strong>public reaction<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nwodim\u2019s response did not require a detailed rebuttal to make its point. By presenting an ordinary workout and a protein-focused meal alongside exaggerated, sarcastic captions, she exposed how easily a woman\u2019s clothing can become a setup for judgment. The \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d wording also played on the language of service and obligation, as if showing up at the gym meant volunteering for scrutiny. The comic reversal asked viewers to notice who was being made responsible for the joke.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The exchange reflects a familiar feature of contemporary <strong>comedy<\/strong>: a punchline can become a second performance when people answer it in public. Nwodim\u2019s captions were not simply a private disagreement made visible; they were a deliberate piece of counter-humor, using timing and repetition to make the original phrasing sound ridiculous from another angle. In a social-media environment where reactions can reach viewers who never watched the initial broadcast, a short post can shape the story as much as the original monologue.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For readers following the exchange, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.comingsoon.net\/tv\/news\/2206419-ego-nwodim-snl-shane-gillis-controversial-joke-response\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">report on Nwodim\u2019s Instagram response<\/a> traces how her Stories became part of the online discussion. The central point is not that a single caption settles the argument; it is that Nwodim used the same comic vocabulary to challenge the assumptions that made Gillis\u2019 joke controversial.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_Shane_Gillis_SNL_Monologue_Sparked_a_Humor_Debate\"><\/span>Why Shane Gillis\u2019 SNL Monologue Sparked a Humor Debate<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gillis\u2019 hosting appearance on <strong>SNL<\/strong>, described in the supplied account as taking place on October 10, placed his stand-up voice on a nationally recognized sketch-comedy stage. His monologue drew on an observational premise: he encounters women in short gym clothes, feels unsure about where to look, and imagines ending up in someone\u2019s TikTok footage. The premise combines everyday awkwardness with exaggeration, a familiar structure in <strong>stand-up<\/strong>, but the wording used to describe women changed how many viewers heard the joke.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">His line about not having visited a gym in a long time framed the scene as a comic surprise. From there, the routine moved to the length of women\u2019s shorts and the possibility that bystanders might be recorded. The punchline about being in the background of multiple TikToks shifted attention toward the speaker\u2019s discomfort, yet the insult directed at women remained a prominent part of the setup. That is why the debate concerned more than whether the scenario was recognizable: it concerned whose behavior was being mocked and whose dignity became the cost of the laugh.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Comedy audiences often disagree about whether a performer is exposing prejudice or repeating it. A joke can invite viewers to laugh at an absurd attitude, but that intention is not always clear from the words alone, particularly when a slur appears as the sharpest phrase. Gillis\u2019 supporters may hear an exaggerated account of gym awkwardness and social-media anxiety; critics may hear women reduced to a derogatory label for wearing ordinary exercise clothes. The distance between those readings is the heart of the <strong>humor debate<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The TikTok reference adds a current layer to the material. Gyms have become visible social-media spaces where people share training clips, progress updates, and comedy sketches, while other gym users may worry about appearing in the background. A routine can acknowledge that tension without blaming women for their clothing or for filming. Gillis\u2019 joke brought those subjects together, but its language made the clothing issue the sharper flashpoint.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a live monologue, laughter and delivery provide context that is difficult to preserve in a short excerpt. Online clips can strip away pacing and surrounding material, while they also make the most contentious line easier to circulate. That does not erase the wording or the response it prompted; it explains why reactions can intensify after a broadcast reaches social platforms. The moment becomes a contest over framing as well as a judgment about the joke itself.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Placed in that context, the controversy is less a simple verdict on whether comedy should be provocative than a discussion about how provocation works. A performer may intend to target awkwardness, but viewers still assess the target they can actually hear in the material. Gillis\u2019 monologue prompted a clear question: when a joke describes women with a degrading term, does the surrounding premise successfully turn that language against the speaker, or does it leave the insult doing the work?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dan_Levys_Criticism_and_the_Wider_Public_Reaction\"><\/span>Dan Levy\u2019s Criticism and the Wider Public Reaction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nwodim was not the only entertainment figure to address the remarks. Dan Levy, the co-creator and star of <em>Schitt\u2019s Creek<\/em>, criticized the language in an Instagram post, arguing that women wearing short shorts at the gym are not defined by that clothing and that men who call them a slur are the ones displaying misogyny. His response made the disagreement explicit: the issue, in his view, was not the length of anyone\u2019s shorts but the insult attached to them.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Levy\u2019s statement and Nwodim\u2019s Stories approached the same dispute in different registers. Nwodim answered through parody, mirroring Gillis\u2019 phrasing in a gym setting; Levy offered a direct distinction between clothing and character. Together, the posts show how public figures can respond to a controversial joke without using the same format or tone. One invites recognition through comic reversal, while the other lays out a plain-language objection.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That contrast matters in an online environment where a debate can become fragmented into screenshots, short clips, and individual quotations. Some viewers encounter the original monologue first, while others see a response before they know the full context. A direct statement can clarify a critic\u2019s position, whereas satire may travel quickly because it is brief and memorable. Each form shapes a different route into the story, and neither guarantees that every audience will interpret the exchange alike.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is also a practical distinction between criticizing a routine and demanding that a performer never take risks. Levy\u2019s argument focused on the label used for women, not on a general prohibition against discussing gym culture, attraction, or awkward encounters. That specificity keeps attention on the joke\u2019s construction: a person can make an observation about an uncomfortable situation without relying on a slur to create the punchline. Such distinctions are important when public debate compresses complicated disagreements into the binary question of whether comedy is \u201callowed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The posts also highlight how criticism can become part of entertainment news without turning into a formal campaign. A cast member sharing a gym selfie, a television creator stating a disagreement, and a host\u2019s monologue can all feed the same cycle of coverage. Audiences then debate the material and the responses, while the people involved may reach separate groups through their own platforms. The result is a conversation about a joke that extends well beyond the television segment itself.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For performers and viewers alike, the exchange offers a useful way to evaluate comic intent alongside effect. It is possible to ask what a routine meant to satirize while also asking whether the actual wording invites an audience to laugh at the people being described. Levy\u2019s objection centered on that second question, and Nwodim\u2019s parody turned it into a comic image: women going to the gym, completing a workout, and refusing to accept someone else\u2019s label as the story of their day.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That combination of pointed criticism and comic response is one reason the <strong>public reaction<\/strong> became a broader conversation rather than a brief disagreement about a single line. The competing responses gave viewers different tools for interpreting the moment: one emphasized the language, the other demonstrated how easily that language could be reversed.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Response<\/th>\n<th>Format<\/th>\n<th>Central emphasis<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Ego Nwodim<\/td>\n<td>Sarcastic Instagram Stories<\/td>\n<td>Reversing the joke\u2019s wording through a gym selfie and meal post<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dan Levy<\/td>\n<td>Direct Instagram criticism<\/td>\n<td>Separating women\u2019s workout clothes from derogatory judgments<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Shane Gillis<\/td>\n<td>SNL monologue<\/td>\n<td>Gym attire, social-media filming, and bystander awkwardness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_SNLs_Live_Format_Shapes_a_Jokes_Afterlife\"><\/span>How SNL\u2019s Live Format Shapes a Joke\u2019s Afterlife<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A monologue on <strong>SNL<\/strong> does not remain confined to the studio. The live broadcast gives a joke an immediate audience, but clips, captions, and reaction posts can carry it into a second phase of public discussion. In Gillis\u2019 case, the controversy grew around a short section of his hosting appearance, while Nwodim and Levy supplied responses that were easy to share independently. The event became a sequence: performance, circulation, critique, and renewed interpretation.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That cycle is familiar across modern television. A viewer may watch a full episode on broadcast or streaming, while another sees only a brief clip on a social platform the next morning. The second viewer might encounter Nwodim\u2019s caption or Levy\u2019s criticism before seeing the monologue. As a result, the same exchange can feel like a debate about a joke, a debate about misogynistic language, or a debate about online outrage, depending on which fragment arrived first.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Live sketch comedy also relies on compression. A monologue has limited time to establish a character, build a premise, and deliver a laugh, so every word carries weight. That economy can make a blunt phrase feel efficient to one audience and needlessly demeaning to another. The production format explains the pressure for a sharp punchline, but it does not decide whether the punchline\u2019s target is clear or whether it works for viewers beyond the room.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a hypothetical viewer named Maya, the story might unfold across several screens: she sees a clip of Gillis\u2019 gym joke in a feed, notices Nwodim\u2019s \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d caption later, and then reads Levy\u2019s objection. Each encounter adds a different piece of information. By the end, her judgment may depend less on whether she enjoys edgy stand-up in general and more on whether she thinks this particular joke made its intended target unmistakable.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That audience journey helps explain why entertainment news coverage often focuses on reactions as well as the original performance. Nwodim\u2019s background as a former cast member adds another layer: she knows the show\u2019s comic vocabulary and public platform, and her response arrived from someone with a history on the program. Her perspective does not automatically settle the debate, but it makes her intervention especially legible to viewers who follow the show\u2019s performers and alumni.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When discussing comedy controversies, a useful approach is to separate the elements rather than treating the entire exchange as one undifferentiated argument:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>Identify the premise:<\/strong> Gillis described discomfort around women\u2019s gym clothing and the possibility of appearing in TikTok footage.<\/li><li><strong>Examine the language:<\/strong> The derogatory term used for women became a central point of criticism.<\/li><li><strong>Consider the target:<\/strong> Viewers can ask whether the joke mocks the speaker\u2019s awkwardness or places women themselves under ridicule.<\/li><li><strong>Read the responses in context:<\/strong> Nwodim used parody, while Levy made a direct argument about the insult.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This sequence keeps analysis focused on what was actually said, how the routine was framed, and why the responses differed. The live broadcast supplied the spark; the internet gave the exchange a much longer afterlife.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_the_Controversy_Reveals_About_Stand-Up_and_Pop_Culture\"><\/span>What the Controversy Reveals About Stand-Up and Pop Culture<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Gillis discussion sits within a wider pop-culture tension: audiences value comedians who take risks, but they also expect the target of a joke to be legible. Those priorities do not always align. A comic may favor blunt language for speed or shock, while viewers judge whether the line challenges a social attitude or simply repeats it. Nwodim\u2019s response brought that tension into focus by using humor to expose the discomfort created by the original phrasing.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Stand-up and televised monologues have different conditions, even when they share a performer\u2019s voice. A club set can evolve over repeated performances in front of audiences who understand the comic\u2019s rhythms, while a televised appearance reaches viewers with varied expectations at once. A line that works for a room may meet a different reading when clipped, shared, and examined by people who do not know the surrounding set. The broad reach of a television platform makes clarity about the target especially consequential.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The broader industry conversation often links a comedian\u2019s material to a public persona. That does not mean every reaction is an accurate account of a performer\u2019s beliefs; it means repeated choices of subject and language can influence how an audience understands the act. In this instance, the gym scenario could have centered on the speaker\u2019s unease about being filmed. The backlash shows that many viewers instead focused on the insult and its implications for women exercising in public.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Other entertainment headlines offer a useful comparison without being part of this specific dispute. Coverage of <a href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/kevin-hart-netflix-special\/\">Kevin Hart\u2019s Netflix special<\/a> illustrates how a comedian\u2019s work is discussed through the lens of performance, audience expectations, and streaming-era visibility. Meanwhile, a separate <a href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/joe-rogan-trump-comments\/\">report about Joe Rogan\u2019s comments on Trump<\/a> demonstrates how public remarks by entertainers can become broader cultural stories. These examples are not evidence about Gillis\u2019 intentions; they show how comedy and celebrity speech routinely cross into larger conversations.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For entertainment outlets, the challenge is to report both the performance and the response without flattening either. Describing Nwodim\u2019s posts as sarcasm captures their method, while noting Levy\u2019s direct criticism gives readers a different perspective. Summarizing Gillis\u2019 setup accurately helps audiences understand what prompted the reactions. When coverage separates quotation, interpretation, and opinion, readers can assess the exchange rather than receiving a prepackaged verdict.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is no single audience response that can represent every viewer. Some may see Gillis\u2019 monologue as an attempt to tease social-media culture; others may find the language demeaning regardless of the intended target. Still others may enjoy Nwodim\u2019s counter-joke precisely because it makes the imbalance visible. The disagreement is part of how popular comedy is evaluated now: not only by the laugh in the room, but by the conversation that follows.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most revealing feature of this episode may be its competing comic forms. Gillis built a routine around a gym encounter, Nwodim answered with a pair of playful captions, and Levy reduced the disagreement to a clear distinction between clothing and insult. Together, those reactions show that the ongoing <strong>humor debate<\/strong> is not simply about whether a comedian may provoke an audience; it is about what the provocation asks viewers to accept as funny.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ego Nwodim\u2019s \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d Response to Shane Gillis Former SNL veteran Ego Nwodim joined the conversation around Shane Gillis after the comedian\u2019s hosting monologue drew criticism for comments about women\u2019s gym clothing. Rather than issue a lengthy statement, Nwodim used Instagram Stories for a brief, pointed response: a gym selfie captioned \u201cWh\u2013e reporting for &#8230; <a title=\"SNL Veteran Weighs In on Shane Gillis\u2019 Controversial \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d Joke\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/snl-vet-shane-gillis-joke\/\" aria-label=\"En savoir plus sur SNL Veteran Weighs In on Shane Gillis\u2019 Controversial \u201cReporting for Duty\u201d Joke\">Lire plus<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tv-show","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybingemate.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}